Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes <br /> ELK GROVE VILLAGE PLAN COMMISSION <br /> Date: Wednesday, December 19, 1984 <br /> Location: Council Chamber <br /> Municipal Building <br /> 901 Wellington Avenue <br /> The meeting was called to order at 7:50 p.m. by Chairman Glass. <br /> Members Present: Members Absent: <br /> John Glass, Chairman Clark Fulton <br /> Fred Geinosky Leah Cummins <br /> Orrin Stangeland Dave Paliganoff <br /> George Mullen <br /> Staff Present: <br /> Thomas Rettenbacher, Building Commissioner <br /> Robin Weaver, Administrative Assistant <br /> Plat of Subdivision: General Numeric <br /> Members considered a two-lot plat of subdivision for General <br /> Numeric. George Mullen moved that the plat be approved. The motion <br /> was seconded by Orrin Stangeland and passed unanimously. <br /> Public Hearing: Docket 84-14 - Petition for Special Use <br /> Hampton Inns <br /> As no court reporter arrived for the meeting, Chairman Glass <br /> directed Robin Weaver, Administrative Assistant, to take minutes during <br /> the public hearing. <br /> The public hearing was called to order at 8:00 p.m. . This was a <br /> continuation of the hearing begun on December 5, 1984. <br /> Ted Novak, attorney for the petitioner, summarized the meeting <br /> with staff on December 12 (letter by Robin Weaver regarding that meeting <br /> is attached) and indicated to the Plan Commission that all engineering <br /> requirements of the Village would be met. <br /> Status on the present billboard on the property was given by Ted <br /> Novak. He assured the Plan Commission that the petitioner is anxious <br /> to relocate the sign and that several alternatives were being pursued <br /> with respect to the sign lease. <br /> Ted Novak reiterated that the Hampton Inn was a prestigious concept, <br /> that market analysis showed this site to be a great location for the <br /> product, and that the Holiday Inn company requires strict standards in <br /> marble vanities, wall fabrics, quality of construction, etc. <br /> The items for consideration, as listed by Ted Novak, are: <br /> (1) Parking stall size variation from 10'x20' to 9'x20' . <br /> Sufficient space is available for the required size <br /> but the request, if granted, would permit more green <br /> space and less impervious surface. <br />