HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTION - 58-77 - 8/23/1977 - HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN, ADOPTING A RESOLUTION NO. 58-77
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN FOR THE VILLAGE OF ELK
GROVE VILLAGE
WHEREAS, the Village of Elk Grove Village has made a study of the housing
needs of the Village; and
WHEREAS, said study has been incorporated into a Housing Assistance Plan as
defined in the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; and
WHEREAS, the Housing Assistance Plan sets the goals to meet the housing needs
of the Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by 'the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Elk Grove Village, Counties of Cook and DuPage, State of Illinois:
Section 1 . That the Housing Assistance Plan attached hereto is hereby
approved and adopted by the Village of Elk Grove Village.
Section 2. That the Village Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a
certified copy of this resolution and the Housing Assistance
Plan to George W. Dunne, President of the Cook County Board
of Commissioners, for inclusion in the Cook County Housing
Requirements to be submitted to the Federal Government.
PASSED this 23rd day of August , 1977.
APPROVED this 23rd day of August 1977,
i
Charles J. Zettek
Village President
ATTEST:
Eleanor G. Turner
by Fay Bishop Deputy Clerk
Village Clerk
Part 1 Housing Type and Condition
According to the 1970 Census, Elk Grove Village is supposed
to have 16 units substandard due to inadequate plumbing. The problems
with the 1970 Census are dealt with in Appendix I . The Village Building
Department knows of no habitable structures with inadequate plumbing.
Two buildings that are not dwelling units exist on land that is being
developed presently.
The Village is twenty years old and all habitable structures
built within Village limits were built to code (BOCA) . Nearby unincor-
porated land still contains many older farmhouses and outbuildings
which may be substandard and the source of the 16 inadequate units.
- 1 -
PART II HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME FAMILIES
The housing assistance needs of lower income households
in Elk Grove Village is estimated in the Housing Assistance Plan -
Table II . The need identified in Table II was determined according
to the definitions and guidelines of the U. S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development using the best available data for Elk Grove
Village.
Presently Residing
The number of households requiring assistance was estimated
by first determining the number of households which now own or which
now rent in Elk Grove Village which are potentially eligible for
assistance because of their family size and income (see Table 2A for
details) . Secondly, to determine the actual need the number of
income eligible households is reduced by the number of housing units
in Elk Grove Village which are affordable by these households . The
number of households now owners (including elderly in separate households)
requiring assistance is estimated in Table 2B and the number of
households now renting (including elderly in separate households)
requiring assistance is estimated in Table 2C.
Elderly
The number of elderly in both separate and shared households
requiring assistance was then estimated (see Determination of Elderly
Need given later) . Elderly living in shared households who require
assistance are elderly living with relatives, who want separate housing
but cannot afford it. The elderly separate households who now own
or who now rent were removed from the number of family households of
four or less persons estimated in Tables 2B and 2C and entered appro-
- 2 -
priately into Table 11 , entry 1A(b-2) and entry 2B(b-2) . The estimate
of 133 shared elderly households requiring assistance were considered
as renter households and added to the number of separate elderly
renter households in Table II , entry 2B(b-2) .
Hand i capped
A handicapped household is "a one or two person household
headed by a person who is under a disability or who is handicapped as
defined in Section 3 of the U. S. Housing Act of 1937 as amended . . .
mobility - limited". (Ms. Margaret Sachs , Associate Planner, NIPC.)
Several data sources werd investigated; none of the sources
represented data limited to the group "handicapped households" as
defined above.
The housing needs of this group will be met as new multi-
family housing using government programs is built in the Village
because 10 percent of the units will be required by federal regulation
to contain provisions for the handicapped.
Additional Families Expected—to Reside
The number of additional families expected to reside as a
result of planned and existing employment facilities was then estimated
(see Determination of Additional Families Expected to Reside given
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
later) . These households were then divided into families of four or
more, families of five or less, and elderly households based on data
from the 1971 Elk Grove Village Housing Need Survey. Estimates of
those expected to reside as a result of planned facilities were based
on data from the Association of Commerce and Industry.
- 3 -
OCA dol old
Ci o s w
c� 02l� d M M N
O CL r�of rr h S
U 2 w N
J ~
� G d
H 'ti •
k IZ:1 c�++ d �' tl. [3 Z3 d
wi 01 0 s w .- o ♦�o v o o W d •�
rrLu o � U
o
W d
p dol oJ� 0 3 d
S' W ♦O �o N ON O O O +:
-1 d U d Ln ..ppp fid+ rCS
2 x m QU U
z o d 3 3
pe
Q d U of
LU
w w
d
fY v
Qy' w -22
W u1 M O. I� O O .� 'O •FOS •Q '•j
2
ae
Oe U �d Doll 3 U O
go
•J O o a s: S4
d '1
W U d q w
•sz TS Zi
cco cfl O N /ll t� VO O ♦ d d
o aN.i 7 3qq Q
x S to 3 o v U
ZIA
o O
LY J 1' S' �O M �o .-. OW O W •�Q G -pa d
Vj
S O C F fL owl no
1- t' d o 0 o O o 0 0 o O O o of 3
d
0 0 0m o o +.n an ui i.n' an ti
-dd £l .gl
ca
� d � vN vi. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 H �• � ~
w o 0 0 0 0 o ui 41 X of of 02 tmu
m
N o E o N o 0 0 0 Q x U P ki ti c.7 ~
.n d O' rn N a ars M rn r r S� Sca
j
of d o
U o d d
1O t� W
�. S W cn
TABLE 29 - OWNER HOUSEHOLDS REQUIRING ASSISTANCE
** NumbeA 06
* Size NumbeA 06 *** OwneA
NumbeA 06 Pn,iee 06 06 Income Numbeh 06 Hou6ehotd6
FamiPy Income Veane As A66ondabte House Etigibte Housee Requ,iAi.ng
Size Limit OwneA House Reed Houeehotd6 AvatabCe Msi6tanee
1 $ 71950 Lela .than 8 1 bn. 16 0 16
Mone than 8 1 M. 15 0 15
10,000 Lena than 8 1 bn. 107 0 107
Mone than 8 1 bn. 100 0 100
2
10,200 Lees than 8 $15, 300 2 bn. 5 0 5
Mane than 8 25, 510 2 bn. 5 168 0
3 11,450 Lee6 than 8 17, 175 2 bA. 25 0 25
Mone .than 8 20,625 2 bn. 23 226 0
4 12, 700 Lees .than 8 19, 050 2 M. 121 0 121
Mone than 8 31, 750 2 bn. 113 206 0
TOTAL OWNER HOUSEHOLDS (INCLUDING ELDERLY) OF
4 OR LESS PERSONS REQUIRING ASSISTANCE 389
5 13,500 Lees .than 8 20,250 3 bn. 86 0 86
Mone than 8 33, 750 3 bn. 81 76 5
6 14, 300 Less .than 8 21,450 3 bn. 31 0 31
Mone .than 8 35, 750 3 bA. 29 0 29
7 15,900 Liss .than 8 23, 850 4 M. 36 0 36
Mane than 8 39, 750 4 bA. 34 0 34
TOTAL OWNER HOUSEHOLDS OF 5 OR MORE PERSONS REQUIRING ASSISTANCE 221
(Table II, entAy Ab-4)
* P&i.ce o6 a66ondabte house a 1, .times .income Ooh owneu 06 Pees .than 8 years and 22 ti.mez
income bon owneu mane than 8 yeaAs
** The numbeA o6 .income eEig.ibte 6amities 6nom Tabte 2A ane separated .into owneu o6 mane
than 8 years and ke66 than 8 yecuu based on data 6nom the EGV Board o6 HeaZth Survey
*** Update o6 Current Hou6.ing Stock o6 Ekk Grove VitZage, August, 1975.
- 5 -
TABLE 2C - RENTER HOUSEHOLDS REQUIRING ASSISTANCE
NumbeA 04
NumbeA Ob RenteA
Size Income Numbet Ob Houzehoedd6
Famity Income AbboAdabte Ob EP.i.g.LbEe Un,it.6 RequiAing
Size Limit Rent Unit Househofds AvaaabCe A66d6.tance
Studio
1 $ 7,950 $165 0A 5 0 5
1 bA.
2 10,000 208 1 bA. 31 0 31
10,200 213 1 b4. 1 50 0
3 11,450 239 2 bA. 7 15 0
4 12, 100 264 2 bA. 35 400 0
TOTAL RENTER HOUSEHOLDS (INCLUDING ELDERLY)
OF 4 OR LESS PERSONS REQUIRING ASSISTANCE 36
5 13,500 281 3 bA. 25 0 25
6 14, 300 298 3 bA. 9 0 9
7 15,900 312 4 bA. 10 0 10
TOTAL RENTER HOUSEHOLDS OF 5 OR MORE PERSONS REQUIRING ASSISTANC El
44
(Table II, entAy Bb-4)
- 6 -
Determination of Elderly—Need
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Step I
Special Census , 1974 Male Female Total
age 60-64 185 204 389
over 65 239 375 614
age 62-64 111 122 233
(equals 60% of 60-64)
Therefore total number of persons
aged 62 E over in EGV * 350 497 847
* 62 is the age qualification for elderly housing assistance set by Congress .
Step 11
If all elderly persons are distributed as in Hoffman Estates (i .e. ,
**
33% live in a separate household* and 67% live in a shared household )
then, given 847 elderly persons in EGV, using the Hoffman Estates ratio:
280 persons are living in separate households (33%)
567 persons are living in shared households (67%)
and, 94% of those persons in shared households are 'other family members",
which is 533 persons.
From Census table, "Population 65 & over by Household Relationship";
Separate households include the category of head of family, wife
of head, male primary individual , female primary individual .
** From Census table quoted above: Shared households include the
categories of other family member, nonrelative, inmate of
institution, and others in group quarters.
Step III
A. 280 persons live in separate elderly households. Assume the
same population characteristics for the persons in separate households
- 7 -
as for the total elderly population (59% female and 41% male) or 165
female persons and 115 male persons .
The number of households these persons represent ranges from
165 households if all 115 males are married to the 165 females up to
280 households if none of these persons are married to each other
or if they are married to a person under 62 years of age.
165 7k 280
midpoint
is 223
The midpoint in the range is 223, which was adjusted upwards to 250 to
account for those who are married to persons under 62 years of age.
B. The percent of elderly households in EGV is the ratio of separate
elderly households to the total number of households in EGV. The range is
165 721$ or 2.3� 250 7721�g or 3.9%
72it or 3.5%
C. Then
2.3% of 610 is 14, # of elderly separate owner households ,
3.5% of 610 is 21 , " income eligible.
3.9% of 610 is 27, "
and 2.3% of 80 is 2, # of elderly separate renter households,
3.5% of 80 is 3, " income eligible.
3.9% of 80 is 3, It "
D. The elderly separate household housing need is the range
14 - 27 owner,
2 - 3 renter,
with 21 owner as the numbers used in Table II .
3 renter
- 8 -
1
Step IV
389 owner family (4 or less) income eligible
-21 owner elderly separate households income eligible
30 owner family (4 or less) income eligible (on Table 11 , entry A b-3)
and 36 renter family (4 or less) income eligible
-3 renter elderly separate household income eligible
33 renter family (4 or less) income eligible (on Table 11 , entry B b-3)
Step V
In Step 11 , 533 is estimated as the number of "other family
member" elderly persons living in shared households. Twenty-five percent
(a general assumption based on differing input from EGV Senior Citizen
Club and EGV Community Services staff) , or 133 persons, of the 533 persons
in shared households would live independently if income would permit.
They form an additional housing need. Adding this 133 persons to the
renter elderly separate household, estimated as 3 households in Step III ,
the total elderly renter need becomes 136 (Table fl , entry B b-2) .
All data was from sources predating Village Grove, and so
to be consistent those units and their occupants were not considered
in the calculations.
It is also assumed that these elderly persons with housing
needs are low income based on NIPC's study, "Ten Year Estimate of
Housing Need by Sector", which states that the need for elderly units
in the northwest sector of Cook County was in the low income range (as
opposed to moderate income range) .
Determination of Additional Families—Effected to Reside
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Existing Employment Facilities ETR
The estimate of the number of households expected to
reside as a result of existing employment facilities was determined
to be 1900 families (see Appendix 11 , the letter from Mr. Preston Caplan,
- 9 -
Area Economist, Chicago Area HUD Office and accompanying explanation) .
To determine the number of large families:
The 1971 Employment Survey, Profile of Respondents , Question D
gives the percentage of large families as 28.3% of the total .
1900 x 283 is 538 large families
1900 - 538 is 1362 families of 4 or less (some elderly)
To determine the number of elderly employees:
Profile of Respondents, Question A:
From the 1971 Employment Survey there were 12 males and 3 females
of age 61 plus. Therefore the percent of elderly in the work force
is: 15/704 total responses is 2.1%
1900 x .021 is 40
1362 - 4o is 1322
Therefore the ETR breakdown is 40 elderly (entry D 2. b-2)
1322 families of 4 or less (entry D 2. b-3)
538 families of 5 or more (entry D 2. b-4)
Planned Facilities ETR
The ETR need of 1900 is 6.3% of the 30,000 total employees .
Estimates from the Association of Commerce and Industry for
the years 1966 to 1973 show an increase of 100 businesses per year
with approximately 10 employees per business , or 1000 employees per year.
1000 x .063 is 63 annual increase in ETR need
(Assuming the same income distribution for the increase as
for the heads of households already employed.)
63/year x 3 years is 189 needed by 1979
10 -
I
To determine the number of large families :
189 x .283 is 53 large families
189 - 53 is 136 families of 4 or less (some elderly)
To determine the number of elderly:
189 x .021 is 4 elderly
136 - 4 is 132 families of 4 or less
Therefore the ETR breakdown is 4 elderly (entry D 1 . b-2)
132 families of 4 or less (entry D 1 . b-3)
53 families of 5 or more (entry D 1 . b-4)
- 11 -
PART II
should The Villa l GNATS
housing stock
througheIle
normal of Elk Grove V' 11a9e believes
'n Order °Pe ration that hOusi
Therefor er to Pr and n9 need
l' Ale, the ViJla9e adopts these dispersjon and growth of the Village s
distousi g oPPortunitiesh for 9eneral Policieslance to the commun'tY
n
bu r limited
iry ted thrOy9hput income
e u
sho
2 DeyeloPersany nof forhood °r structur@unitY rather thanito cenld be
'n the Vjti ure mulri_famil Crated
age should y rentalConstr encou hous
3. DeveloPerscof n Housing Assaistanceraged to seek Secifon families
should future multi-f for 20 Percent 8, New
have IDp emi)y rery Of
their
Withboth Aerce suhsr Cal ho n9 for the
units.
nt usl
4 AcodeProposrly
ed rouDtan fa�MDq Policies. IS
fpr their
units in accordance e
s and Ordinance, y housing Must
me
With the commd thus be
et the Village's
S. Managers t the ni tfivey's Character. e Of
high
quality and onslsteryt
built �n the VIIIa family rental
8, EXlsting yo 9e should be mad developments air
6, Makt ci Ute In the uProg am gram and should belenc With the Section
se Should
be raged to Par-
7. Thethousingln e d veloPmentrnade of xistan9 housing without cOncen-
In adopting function without discrimination
has tried n9 specifl
F to realist• c Policies future
Village reSourcesily analyze what Can
Villa
9e of Elk Grove
'he r@for be dornee
i Villa9e
e, the goats 9 very present and
- 12 - only generally
i
proportionate.
Presently, there are still 100 unsubsidized units at Village
Grove (although at least 15 tenants have sought and received housing
assistance through the Section 8, Existing Program of the Housing
Authority of Cook County) . The development known as Rohlwing Grove was
zoned for 768 total units , and the developer has requested Section 8,
New Construction Housing Assistance for 20 percent of the units in
the initial phase. If the developer requests 20 percent housing
assistance in phases 2 and 3, the total number of Section 8, New
Construction that can be foreseen at this time would be 154 units.
If any new proposals for multi-family rental developments are proposed
to the Village, the developers would be approached, as mentioned
above, and encouraged to consider Section 8, New Construction.
Depending on the outcome of those conversations, this table could
be revised in the New Construction section. The Village has five
existing apartment complexes, and some of those units would be
available for the Section 8, Existing Housing Program if the managers
agree to participate.
Using these facts , the distribution of units is as
follows:
3 Year Goals
100 units - Elderly New Construction
154 units - Family New Construction
90 units - Family Existing
1 Year Goals
100 units - Elderly New Construction (for Village Grove)
62 units - Family New Construction (for Rohlwing Grove)
- 13 -
I Year Goals (continued)
30 units - Family Existing
28 for Families of 4 or less
2' for Families of 5 or more
There are no 3 bedroom units in the apartment complexes .
There is a possibility that one or two individually rented
units may become available.
This Housing Assistance Plan will be reviewed and, if
necessary, revised after the first year of implementation to reflect
the experience of that year and any new information which may be then
available.
- 14 -
Appendix I
The production of data in this Plan was not completed without
difficulty. Although information should be available on both housing
conditions and population from the 1970 Census, this source has many
errors. The problems with the Census have been well documented. In
March 1972, the Village administration summarized the situation in
saying "the final 1970 U. S. Census showing 24,516 persons was in
error". Special Census during and since that time have validated
this conclusion. The actual population in 1970 within the Village
boundaries can be estimated to have been 19,500.
Data Sources
A Progress Report to the EGV Board, Appendix II , Survey Report,
November 23, 1971 .
EGV Family Interview Survey, Board of Health, December 1975 and
Section III , June 1976.
Comparison of Special Census Information, February 7, 1975•
Housing Assistance Plan, Village of Hoffman Estates , March 15, 1976.
Reports from Dr. John Lucas , March and September, 1976.
Update of Current Housing Stock of EGV, August, 1975.
- 15 -
Appendix It
",!�e��q°R'ON DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
CHICAGO AREA OFFICE
W* 1 NORTH DEARBORN STREET
c
°�a°�w+°' CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60602
REGION V September 27, 1976
l00 South Wacker D
C hlcay°, Illinois 6060660z
IN REPLY REFER TO:
5.2M (Caplan)
I
Mrs. Kathy Duoba t
582 Bristol Lane
Elk Grove Village, Illinois 60007
Dear Mrs. Duoba:
You requested our estimate of Expected-To-Reside as a result of already
existing employment in Elk Grave Village. You informed us that there
were 30,000 jobs in Elk Grove Village and that 90% of the employees
holding these jobs or 27,000 were commuters. Based on these data we
estimate the expected-to-reside as a result of already existing employ-
ment in Elk Grove Village is 1,900.
The Journey To Work Volumne with data for the Chicago Metropolitan Area
does not contain data specifically applicable to Elk Grove Village. For
that reason we used data applicable to the remainder of Cook County
outside Chicago, which is available in the Journey-To-Work Volumne.
We estimate that the ratio of income eligible families with a worker
to the total number of workers in the remainder of Cook County is 10.24%.
We applied this percentage to Elk Grove Village. On this basis it can
be estimated that there are 10.24 x 27,000 or 2,764 income eligible
families who reside outside of Elk Grove Village that have a worker in
Elk Grove Village. Rounded off this is roughly 2,800 families.
The 2,800 families was multiplied by the SMSA percentage which is 72.6%
and is multiplied again by the Elk Grove Village percentage.
The Elk Grove Village percentage is approximately 2,800 ; 3,000 or 93%.
The multiplication of the three numbers is 2,800 X 72.6% X 93% = approximately
1,900 families.
The description of the SMSA percentage, the city percentage and the gross
expected-to-reside is listed in the instructions for the completion of the
Housing Assistance Plan forms. 1
There are other methods that can be used to derive the expected-to-reside
but the method that I used has the advantage using census material .
If you have further questions please feel free to call me.
JLJ
Ser�elTY>
Preston S. Caplan
Area Economist
- 16 -
The formula is as follows: 2800 x 72.6% x 93%• The 72.6%
is the percentage of non-commuting income eligible workers or the
number of income eligible workers who live and work in the same
municipality divided by the total number of income eligible workers .
The 93% is the percentage of income eligible workers who commute
into Elk Grove Village or the number of income eligible workers
who work in EGV but do not live here divided by the total number
of income eligible workers in EGV.
Re the use of 72.6%. The formula addresses itself to
the fact that HUD does not expect every income eligible worker to
live in the community in which he/she works . Instead HUD uses as
a guideline the actual SMSA percentage of non-commuting income
eligible workers , the 72.6% factor discussed above.
- 17 -
p � J
na W F J m
._ o . 6I o 0o a =
LLO W
j Z
W Q
S
i 6 F O J N
L� rj p
yA
M N
1] y5C
W Y
a H
<J K A
0 0 0 o Na
= m m u Q
z
N �
o N a
ll WI O W 6 N A
fl rl O O N N U ri
o n m o n N o
o O r f o v >
s a o
O O O 0 �
j W LLILL R1 � Q LL E N N
= J O a a H N
m Z _
o H O ry a N
� E A
O C
I O U 4
� Z O
Q U J N N
J Off'' I r N O N N O N Vr Q
p W ail � N N 1'1 I'1 N O
a c
O I W
Q v
F N 4
O W 4
� � o
x z .
E E Q
J
U
m _•
r w a a 4
o m z z
V 0 0
19 r
o >° 1 >' ' LL v o• ce
F •r+ J W
Z
m
18
i
7 w I _
O
n S
f w n I Q
W O
O W `
V n
J W n S
W p I
6
Em J o
'oF O
po =
W
= li OJEo
O o
= O
O w
O ZtJ 'o llw
p 0 0 o p
0 m w J JU
> W F FII F O Z ry
o Z z zij <
W wz
p Q V I
O <
Z N Z OF
m N
N
Q 6 W
i Z p
V F uj �
F
ti Jp
W
p J n J ry m m (•1 N N 1!1 f'1 N
Q1 O F � i d m 1'1N I(1
n
a <
Z p V p
w0
W W W
V y
i I N
a
< y o mo N d
I .a m o .i
V1 O �p N ri,i N 6
Q
CV p E W
mG �t] F�=•z_ I
b O Z OF o y y & a =O O
W r I
.•i J y v� • H.�
h W 7
Z Z i p d j W� J E p
y Oad =_Qm
V O i O Z
TO Fp b O_} 06C ¢2 mSNF ¢
N p
< NN Waw00¢ 04< Jp a SZ
O O W ' OU
F
Z ¢ m U O W
- 19 -
-• Form A111 of
OMB No. 63R-1471 Pose 1 of 2 Pa es
U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
TABLE III. GOALS FOR LOWER INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE
CURRENT'YEAR GOAL
NAME OF LPe L;CPNT iXj ORIGINAL
Village of
Elk Grove Village AMENDMENT, DATE:
2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER . PROGRAM YEAR
B , — I — I I I - I I I —
FgOM: TO:
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS TO BE ASSISTED
TYPES AND SOURCES OF ASSISTANCE
ALL ELDERLY OR LARGE
HANDICAPPED FAMILY FAMILY
HOU LDS (l or less
if—Z persons/ persons) (S or mme
Pe.sans)
(a) (b) (e) (d1 le)
A. NEW RENTAL UNITS
1�1. Section 8—HUD 162 100 62
x 2. Stale A encv—Totol(3-uj ltne.. o and b)
s a. S,i 8
b. Other
s 3. Other Assisted New Rental Housing
peenr,fyl- Total _
6 a
T 6.
e d. Total (ca,n ,f In,. I.2,an,f 3) 162 100 62
B. RENASU.TATtON OF RENTAL UNITS
s 1. Sectlon 8—HUD
tD 2. $tate Agency_Total(Som of Iln. and 6)
n a. $ecuon8_
T2 6. Other
13 3. Other Assisted Rehobililotion of Rental Housing
`Id—Hf:) — Total
14
:64. Total ("._Nf 1,,, i,
C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS
n 1. Sectlon 8—HUDJQ 28 21
19 :2 _stare Agenc (_,n a/ling. iand b)
,a 1I a. Section 8
_
Other A isred E.Isting Rentol Housing
rl,l.nrd,)s— Toml
a.
23 1 6.
24 ld. Total (q—.,(lino. 1,Z, and 3) 30 28 2
ID. REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR
PROSPECTIVE_HOM_EOWNERS
zs I. CD Block Grants
26 2. Section 235
n
33. Other Rehabilitation Assistance to Homeowners or
Pro zOective Hom mwners;F(.ntifd - Total
b.
zo fid. Tmal (`' el Lr 1.2 n11)
11 E. NEW CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR
PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS
st�1_S<cooB 235_
sz 12. Other Id.nufy/=Total
a.
aA
b.
as 1 3. Total aw of 1In.> I and 11
1
36 F. ALL HOUSING ASSISTANCE GOALS
foamof1—. N,111,C3,U3, .,d E3) 192 100 90 2
HUD-7015-10(12-75) j
20 _
•. Page 2 el 2 Peges
U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
TABLE III. GOALS FOR LOWER INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE
THREE YEAR GOAL
1. NAMEOG APPLICANT 3. ORIGINAL
Village of
Elk Grove Village AMENDMENT. DATE!
z. PLICFrION;cF4Nr N 9ER 4. PROGRAM YEAR
FROM: TO:
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS TO BE ASSISTED
TYPES AND SOURCES OF ASSISTANCE L(I-2persons)
RLY OR FAMILY LARGE
ALL ICAPPED (jOr l<Sfi FAMILY
HOUSEHOLDS persons) (> ' re
persons)
P) (b) (c) (d) (d
A. NEW RENTAL UNITS
t 1. secim,8 254 100 144d 10
x 2. State A enc –Total(Sum Of lines a and b)
3 a. Section 8
I;. Other
E 3. Other Assisted New Rental Housing
(Idenulyl . T_otal
6 a-
0 I6.
4. Total (Solo of lna. 1.2.and 3) 254 100 144 10
10. REHABILITATION OF RENTAL UNITS
3 . 1. Section B.HUD
10 2. State Agency—Total(iwn of lines o nd b)
11 Section 8
1z i 6. Other
3. Other Assisted Reh.biht.I,.n of Rental Housing
a
IS 1
d. Total ('—al lin,c !,!.and 3
C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS:
1l I. Section 8—HUD 90 84 6
1s 2. Score Agency–Tota_ (.rota ,I lines a and b) '
1sa. Section
0 6. Other
z1 3. Ocher Assisted Existing Rental Housing
(ldonrpv)- Total
u
Ob.
z4 1 4. Total (s—of fl,,.,, 1.2.and 4) 90 84 6
D. REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR
PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS
zs' I. CD Black_Grams
zs: 2. Section 235
27 , 3. Other Rehabilitation Assistance to Homeowners or
Pro spec tine Homeowners l/den erL/- Total
o
—b�
4. Tocol 1... . L_ and tl
E. NEW CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR
PRO SP ECTIV_E_HOMFOwN ERS
31 1. Section 235
3z 2. Otheri/denrJ,/. Total
33 ' a.
3e l 3. Total(Sum of Ines Ind J
3o F. ALL HOUSING ASSISTANCE GOALS 344 100 228 16
(`em./to— 41.tit,C1.U1,and h'3
n PERCENT OF ALL HOUSEHOLDS �– 1000 %
G. EXPLANATION OF PRIORITIES(I<mcA addlllanolpages)
MUD-7015.10(12-35)
21
I
w • OMB o.63 -1
OMB Na.6]R�ldll
U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
TABLE IV — GENERAL LOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED LOWER INCOME HOUSING
1. NAME OF APPLICANT 3. ORIGINAL
Village of
Elk Grove Village AMENDMENT. DATES
2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER A. PROGRAM YEAR
B —
FROM: TO:
A. IDENTIFY GENERAL LOCATIONS ON MAP IN THIS APPLICATION
1. New Consbucbon: Celsus Tract Numbers
7601 and 8046: the tracts containing the residential areas of the Village.
2: Rehabilitation: Census Tract Numbers
i
Not applicable.
B. EXPLANATION OF SELECTION OF GENERAL LOCATIONS
1. New Construction
The Village believes that housing needs should be met through the normal
growth of the Village housing stock in order to promote dispersion and
balance. Tracts 7701 and 8401 are planned for industrial Use only and
were not designated for assisted housing.
I
2, Rehabilitation
Not applicable.
HUD-7013.11 (12-75)
22 -