Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTION - 100-68 - 10/22/1968 - OBJ TO PROPOSED ZONING/COOK CTYRESOLUTION NO. Z4zzo A RESOLUTION DIRECTED TO THE COOK COUNTY BOARD. OF COMMISSIONERS, COOK COUNTY BOARD OF APPEALS, AND THE COUNTY CLERK FOR TRANSMITTAL TO COOK COUNTY BOARD OF CONMISSIONERS PROTESTING THE RE -ZONING OF PROPERTY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF DEVON BISECTED BY BISNER (IF EXTENDED) WHEREAS the Petitioner and Owner of the property, Exchange National Bank of Chicago, Trustee, under Trust No. 14893 is the owner of property legally described as follows: LEGAL That part of the South half of fractional Section 31, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the South East corner of said Section 31, and thence North 20 chains (1320.20 feet) thence West 8.25 chains (544.5 feet), thence South 20 chains, thence East 8.25 chains to the place of beginning. ALSO, the South West quarter of the South West quarter of Section 32, Township 31 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, except the East.981.93 feet thereof in Cook County, Illinois. and has petitioned for the re -zoning of the Easterly 10 plus acres of same from R-3 to R-4 Single Family Residence and the Westerly 16 acres thereof from R-3 to the R-6, General Residence District (Multi-Family),.and. WHEREAS the Village of Elk Grove Village is within 1-1/2 miles of the subject property and is legally entitled to file objections thereto, and WHEREAS said case 'has been docketed as Docket No. 1384 by the Cook County Zoning Board of Appeals, NOW,THEREFORE BE I7' RESOLVED by the President and Board of Trustees, of the Village of Elk Grove Village, Counties of Cook and DuPage, Illinois: Section 1: That the Village of Elk Grove Village does hereby object to the re -zoning of said property as petitioned for the following reasons: (a) That it opposes the re -zoning of any portion of the above described property to the R-6, General Residence District -1- (Multi -Family) since said re -zoning would constitute spot zoning in that there are no uses within 3,000 square feet of subject property which is other than single family residence, schools, churches or related uses and that the intrusion of multi -family would be disruptive of the pattern of development of the area which is established as single family residence. (b) That the re -zoning of the property will create a bad precedent for future zoning and cause additional multi- family re -zoning in other directions around it; that the area in question does not have the street or public utility facilities to support such intense use as R-6. 22nd (c) That the Village of Elk Grove Village did on the day of October , 1968 adopt a comprehensive plan heretofore recommended to it for adoption by Tec Search, its planning consultants and its Plan Commission. That said com- prehensive plan, which has been in study for 2 1/2 years, identifies subject property and designates it for single family use only. That there is in existence extensive single family new development both to the East and North and new single family residence development to its immediate East. (d) That the Village of Elk Grove Village is the owner of public utilities as to sanitary sewer and water, which facilities are the only such facilities; in the vicinity, and refuses to make same available to the subject property if subject property is to be used for other than single family use. That in the evidence produced by petitioner, he indicated possible connection with Metropolitan Sanitary District sewer to be installed 2,000 feet North of subject property by the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Chicago, that petitioner has no easements by which he could connect subject property to said sanitary district line and that as a practical matter, subject property can and should only be served by public utilities available in the area by Elk Grove Village; that Elk Grove Village agrees to make said facilities available provided subject property is used for single family purposes as detailed in the comprehensive plan of the Village. (e) That the Village objects to the re -zoning of any portion of the property from. R-3 to R-4, Single Family Residence, since this would merely reduce lot size from 20,000 square feet to 10,000 square feet and seek to provide sanitary sewage by septic tank if developed in the County, which is neither desirable nor healthy and that if the property is to be developed in the County, it should retain its R-3 classification with 20,000 square foot lots so as to provide adequate and sufficient septic fields; that if petitioner desires inclusion in Elk Grove Village, he would be afforded water and sewer in keeping with its standard policies and procedures and could be developed on lots of 7,500 square feet. -2- M That the best use of the property, both from the property owner's point of view and the community is its development within the Village of Elk Grove Village as single family residence and such could best be encouraged by denial of the application. Section 2: This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval according to law. PASSED this 22nd day of October , 1968. APPROVED this 22nd day of October , 1968. Jack D. Pahl President ATTEST: Eleanor G. Turner Village Clerk r 1 Cook County Board of Commissioners Cook County Bldg. Room 523 Chicago, .111. 60602 RICHARD B. OGILVIE, President Cook County Board of Commissioners The ]Board of Commissioners Mathew W. Bieszczat Jerome Huppert Charles S. Boric Lillian Piotrowski Charles F. Chaplin Ruby Ryan George W. Dunne Harry H. Semrow William N. Erickson Josephine B. Sneed Floyd T. Fulle John J. Touhy Charles J. Grupp, Jr. Kenneth E. Wilson Road and Bridges Committee Jerome Ruppert, Chairman +.gnjfCrtetkCRCiCt1.� -e ..�_+._...._ _ vi_lmr(I 1r aaa.._.. ao a Cook County Clerk Edward J. Barrett Zoning Board of A,.,,-eals Homer H. Fie V s; Alex R. Sei`--h Georme Ka-afo'';.as Morton :Ka-lan Ro--)arse Marks CERTIFIED COPIES OF RESOLUTION. YO. ICO -38 WERE SENT TO EAC'; OF TIE ABOVE `TAMED PERSOP'S ON OCTOBER 25, 19 SF, .