HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS - 10/19/1982 - 11
C, .,
MINUTES
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS COMMITTEE MEETING
o OFFICE
Tuesday October 19, 1982
MEMBERS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT
Charles Zettek, Village President Gary Parrin, Ass't. Vill. Manager
Michael Tosto, Committee Chairman George Knickerbocker, Vill. Attorney
Ronald Chernick, Committee Member George Coney, Finance Director
Stephen Uhlarik, Committee Member Leonard Flood, Ass't. Finance Director
Joseph Bosslet, Trustee Thomas Cech, Public Works Director
Edward Hauser, Trustee Ray Peterson, Village Engineer
James Petri, Trustee
OTHERS PRESENT
Stan Klyber, Greater O'Hare Assoc.
Major Lawrence, Lawrence Foods
Lester Lawrence, Lawrence Foods
Bill Robertson, Field Container
Russ Mossman, T.A. & D.A. Troy Co.
Thomas Flatland, Flatland, Hinners & Co.
Richard Nelson, RJN Env. Consultants, Inc.
The meeting commenced at 7:02 p.m. on Tuesday, October 19, 1982 in the
Multi-Purpose Room of the Elk Grove Village Municipal Building. The meeting
was chaired by Mike Tosto, Chairman of the Capital Improvements Committee.
The sole purpose of the meeting was to discuss the Industrial Drain-
age Ditch Project being considered for the eastern portion of the indus-
trial park. The project would be financed by establishing a Special Taxing
District funded in part by the entire Village ($800,000 to $1.9 mil.) , and
the remaining $4.5 million + funding by the properties within the District.
The project includes the construction of storm sewers, additional detention
facilities and the improvement of existing ditches - Alt. #6 of the RJN
Flood Control Study.
Tom Flatland of Flatland, Hinners & Company, the Villages financial
consultant for this project, discussed the financing of the project. He
gave copies of the written report to all those in attendance. The report
discussed various scenarios that could be undertaken to finance the project,
and the financial impact to all the taxpayers (both those in and out of the
proposed district) . Mr. Flatland also stated that now is a very desireable
time to get into the bond market as interest rates are at their lowest rate
in some time.
cont'd. ..
Capital Improvements Committee Meeting
Page 2
November 2, 1982
In order to make the bonds more attractive for the $4.5 million
which would be the responsibility of the properties in the District,
two things can be done. One, they could be insured, or two, the Village
could enter into an agreement with the District whereby the Village can
back the entire $4.5 million issue - this is possible for a home rule
community. By so doing, the interest rate paid on these bonds would be
reduced as they would be more secure than if they were only backed by
the properties in the District.
The following are the steps that are involved in completing the
project:
1. Authorization from the Board for the Public Hearing,
2. Disseminate information relative to the project to
the parties involved,
3. Hold the Public Hearing,
4. 60-day period after the hearing for petitioners to
approve or abolish the District,
5. Village Board approve the ordinance establishing
the District,
6. 6 - 7 months for Engineering,
7. One year to construct the project.
The Village is considering, as incentive to do the project,
financing those portions of the project within Village rights of way,
and to take over maintenance of the completed improvement if Alternate
#6 is constructed. This amounts to approximately $800,000 to $1.4 mil-
lion (depending on whether sewer is placed on Nicholas Blvd.) in cap-
ital costs, and an estimated $38,400/year in maintenance costs.
Richard Nelson of RJN Environmental Associates took some time
to discuss Alternate #6 of the study. Discussion revolved around the
physical improvement proposed, and also if all properties contributing
water to the District were included in the District (they are not) .
The meeting adjourned at 9:05 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Ray L. � e�village Engineer
RLP:pp
cc: CAWillis
All in Attendance