HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS - 05/30/1986 - Minutes of the Capital Improvements Committee Meeting
Monday, May 30, 1966
Board Members Present
Trustee Tosto, Chairman
Trustee Chernick, Committee Member
Trustee Gallitano, Committee Member
Staff Present
Thomas J. Cech, Director of Public Works
The Committee met at Village Hall at 6:30 pm and drove to Nicholas
Boulevard to walk the sidewalks from Landmeier to Higgins Road.
Visual observations were:
1. AAR Corporation had replaced all the sidewalk in front of
their building.
2. Nearly all the remaining sidewalk was either broken or
settled and in need of replacement or mudjacking.
3. It was estimated that 20-25% of the curbing was in needof
replacement also.
4. Some of the driveway aprons were settled and broken and in
need of maintenance.
5. Vehicle/truck traffic was crossing the sidewalk at some of
the narrower driveway aprons.
No decisions were made at this meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Thomas J. Cech
Director of Public Works
TJC/cla
c: Village President
Board of Trustees (6)
Village Manager
Village Clerk
%i `'I-
May 12, 1986
TO: Chorles'AA .illis, Village Manager
FROM:
A o e; ill Eng' eer ..,
SUBJECT: NICHOLAS BOULEVARD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT
On April 74, 7986 we met with representatives of Donohue & Assoc-� N
iotes, Inc. to discuss the status and reactivation of the Nicholas Boulevard �c
Roadway Improvement. Based upon a letter received from Donohue on r
December 77, 1985, they indicated that construction costs for this project
would range between $1.54 million to $1.65 million dependent upon the Z
Village's funding source and pavement configuration. In addition, engineering
costs would range between $59,800 and $80,500. The range of engineering i
costs were again based on the funding source and pavement configuration. -f-
In order to obtain a more specific estimate of construction and
engineering costs, we advised Donohue that:
i
1 The project would be totally Village
funded, eliminating the need for
revie w/opprovoI by I.D.O.T. and ► Q
F.H.W.A. n $�•
2. The pavement configuration would ' h
be 48 feet wide constructed of tt
Portland Cement Concrete. or
rI
3. Drainage was to be enclosed,
eliminating the present median
ditch, with outfall to existing storm
drains.
4. The elevation of the finished pove- M `�
ment must relate to existing building f
floor elevotions and positive drainage
between buildings and the roadway p
was to be maintained. 5t.
In conjunction with the above parameters, Donohue prepared a
letter to me dated April 17, 1986 which identified principle work items that
remained to be completed in order to affect a bid letting and start of cons-
truction during the fall of 7986. These items include:
Page 1
1. Verification of pavement base require-
ments to insure proper design/construction
of the new pavement, in relotion to
average doily traffic and percent of
truck traffic.
2. Approval of roil crossing details, including
drainage, construction format and coordin-
otion comments, by the Chicago and North-
western Transportation Co.
3. Determination of drainage system design
details that will include analysis of drainage
release from the roadway to existing outfolls,
the volume of water to be stored on the
pavement, the volume that may be stored
in in-ground detention and the impacts of
drainage changes on fronting property.
4. Redesign of the north terminal intersection
at Londmeier to include intersection revisions
caused by the design of improvements on
Londmeier, including signolizotion of the
intersection, by the Cook County Highway
Deportment.
5. Other items necessary to complete the plans,
specifications and bidding documents and
prepared documents for release to contractors.
The engineering cost to provide these items of work was
estimated to be $47,600 including all salaries, overhead and profit, soils
exploration and analysis, and supplies and services including printing.
As background information, between the years 1978 and 1980,
the Village expended approximately $108,000 to Warren Van Proog Cons-
ulting Engineers to hove the Nicholas Boulevard Roadway plans prepared to
92%, completion. Based upon normal engineering fees of 6% and Donohue's
most recent estimate of approximately $1.65 million, total engineering fees
for this project would normally amount to $99,000. In lieu of the fact that
we hove already spent $108,000 for this project on additional engineering
charge of $47,630 to complete the plans would yield an engineering cost of
9.43% of the estimated construction cost.
It was my feeling that Donohue's estimate of $47,630 was
excessive and for that reason met with them again on May 1, 1986 to dis-
cuss exactly what work was required that necessitated the $47,630 fee.
During that meeting I was advised that the fee of $47,630 represented o
"worst-case" scenario. Since the original set of plans had not been
Page 3
active for five years, questions had arisen concerning the current status of
design items and other events which hod token place that would require in-
vestigotion and/or redesign. These items include:
1. Level of coordination and cooperation
with the Cook County Highway Deportment
regarding the intersection of Nicholas and
Londmeier.
1. Level of coordination and cooperation with
the Chicago and Northwestern Transportation
Co.
3. Field checking of utility locations to determine
changes since 7980.
4. Field checking the existing topography of the
roadway.
5. Rechecking the area drainage plan to determine
if changes would be required to the drainage
plans identified on the engineering plan.
I was advised that if major changes to the drainage and existing
roadway configuration hod not occurred and if there was o substantial level
of cooperation with Cook County Highway Department and the Chicago and
Northwestern Transportation Co., the gross engineering fee would not exceed
$35,000.
Because I felt the range of $35,000 to $47,630 was still quite high,
i contacted another consulting engineering firm to review the plans and pro-
vide me with on engineer's cost estimate to finalize the engineering and pre-
pare o bidding package. Povio-Morting d Co. prepared a proposal which
indicated that the engineering cost to finalize the plans would range between
$57,000 and $77,000 based again upon the cooperation of outside agencies and
changes to the existing roadway area.
Although I still believe that engineering costs ranging between
$35,000 and $47,630 ore high, l am confident that another consultant can-
not complete the project for on engineering cost less than this.
Donohue indicated that in order to save time and advise the
Village as to on exact engineering cost, they would be willing to begin the
preliminary background work based on the execution of o Purchase Order in
the amount of $4,000. Within two weeks, after beginning the initial investi-
gation, Donohue will advise the Village as to exactly what work will be required
to complete the plans and also on exact engineering cost. This engineering cost
will range between $35,000 and $47,630 including the $4,000 to be authorized
by Purchase Order.
Page 4
It appears that the execution of o Purchase Order with
Donohue will allow the implementation of this project as quickly as will be
necessary in order to retain o September 8, 1986 start of construction. Dur-
ing the period of initial investigation, we con be negotiating on engineering
agreement between the Village and Donohue which will further expedite the
completion of the project.
I would, therefore, respectfully recommend we authorize a
Purchase Order in the amount of $4,000 to Donohue to begin preliminary
investigation of the items necessary to complete the final engineering plops
and at the some time begin negotiating for on engineering agreement at o
cost not to exceed the range of $31,000 to $43,630.
AJB:pp
A t tochments