HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS - 03/30/2000 - Capital Improvement Committee
March 30, 2000
9 A
Present: Patton L. Feichter, Chairman
Bart K. Dill, Member
James P. Petri, Member
Staff: Raymond R. Rummel, Assistant Village Manager
John Stukel, Superintendent of Utilities
ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS TO WELL #2 AND WELL#6
The Committee reviewed the total water needs of Elk Grove Village. Back-up water
capacity is available through the following methods (MGD stands for Millions of Gallons
of water per Day):
Elk Grove Water Demand
Average 7.2 MGD
Peak 13.0 MGD
Community Interconnects MGD Maximum Capacity
Bensenville 0.8
Wood Dale 0.6
Arlington Heights 1.5
Roselle 4,8
Total Available 3.7 MGD
EGV Operating Well Capacity MGD Maximum Capaci y
Well #8 1.3
Well 49 1.1
Well #11 1.6
Well #13 (low quality water taste) 0.7
Well #14 16
Total Wells 6.3 MGD
EGV Wells Under Repair MGD Maximum Capacity
Well #2 1.7
Well #6 019
Total Wells Under Repair 2.6 MGD
The Committee discussed the following facts concerning water supply:
• Elk Grove has an interconnect with Schaumburg; however, if JAWA water is
disrupted to Elk Grove it will likely be disrupted to Schaumburg.
• If Elk Grove experiences an emergency during a peak demand period,the
interconnected communities will meet their needs first before assisting Elk Grove's
emergency. The interconnect capacity assumes a low use day. The interconnects
cannot be relied upon during peak use (hot summer) periods.
• The business park and ABMC utilize 2J3`d of the Village's water. A disruption to the
water system will disrupt businesses and the hospital.
• The Village is served by JAWA through a single, 7 foot diameter water pipe running
approximately 5 miles long. The pipe is approximately 14 years old. Any break in
that pipe can result in loss of service w Elk Grove for an extended duration. A copy
of the JAWA distribution map is attached.
• O'Hare airport is engaging in construction near this water main.
The Committee then discussed the need f'or additional improvements to Well #2 and Well
#6. It was noted that it is very expensive to service a well. It is more cost effective to
repair all items when the well is under repair.
Well #2
The casing inserted into the well #2 has deteriorated. This casing prevents the shale stone
surrounding the well hole from collapsing; and filling the well.
Originally, it was anticipated that the casing would be in acceptable condition. Upon
removing the metal casing, it was found to be deteriorated beyond reuse. Either the
casing must be replaced or the well must be capped. The well will not remain operational
without the casing. The casing costs at a maximum $48,000 additional to install.
Well#6
The column pipe was originally anticipated to have all but 240 feet reused. Upon
opening the well and inspecting the pipe, none of it can be reused. The anticipated cost
of this pipe is $14,775 to install.
Consensus
The consensus of the Committee was to recommend the following:
• Increasing the contract with Layne-Western in an amount of$62,775 to perform the
required repairs to Well #2 and Well 46;
• Discussing this item at the April 11 Committee of the Whole meeting; and,
• Placing the necessary approvals on the April 1 I Village Board Consent Agenda.
The meeting adjourned at 9:30 pm.
c: President& Board of Trustees, Village Manager, Assistant Village Manager, Assistant
to the Village Manager, Village Clerk, Director of Public Works.
V �
,
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
March 9, 2000
Present: Trustee Feichter, Chairman
Trustee Petri, Member
Trustee Dill, Member
Staff: Gary E. Parrin, Village Manager `r 1`
George Knickerbocker, Village Attorney MA
MacArthur, Fire Chief R 1 3 20pp
Thomas Cech, Director of Public Works
Others: Ron Zamarin, Special Counsel
Trustee Feichter called the meeting to order at 3:35pm.
Fire Station and Public Works Remodeling Project:
Mr. Parrin explained that the project costs were $442,000 over budget. By reviewing and
revising the furniture and equipment budget and reducing the contingency from 10% to 7%, we
have reduced the budget shortfall to $249,000. Also, staff has negotiated a fee reduction with
FGM and recommends accepting alternate 45 (deletion of storage shed at Biesterfield) further
reducing the shortfall to $229,000. Furthermore, Clark Dietz has agreed in principal to accept
risk and provide the Village a guaranteed maximum construction price at the 7% contingency
figure.
The committee discussed other options including delaying the project for a better bidding
climate. They also confirmed their desire to not make significant reductions in the scope of the
project.
Mr. Zamarin stated that we need to revise our current construction management contract with
Clark Dietz. Also, the Village will assign the construction trade contracts to Clark Dietz with the
cooperation of all the contractors. This process was not completed at this time.
Mr. Parrin reviewed the availability of Capital Project Funds with the Committee. Sufficient
funds are available for this project without jeopardizing other planned projects.
The committee unanimously approved accepting the low bid proposals received January 27,
increasing the budget for the project, and proceeding with the revised contract with Clark Dietz
and assignment of contracts to them to obtain a guaranteed maximum price for the Village.
Meeting adjourned about 4:30pm.
TJC.gr
c: President and Board of Trustees, Village Manager, Assistant Village
Manager Assistant to the Village Manager, Village Clerk, Village
Attorney, All Department Heads
M1 '9
W
�—
ol
PT•Y'�
Z Q OH Z(Y N U' ¢ Vl
¢ z E a;a z �n� � z m 0
W z _
o z o N V) 0 () J
� W N
5 J 3 a da w a w Q a
wz ma >
N 'o
0 z W N
vo � Y
W I I z � a
0 J
Q ❑
a
0
❑ 50
s—y-
w
o
a
N c
Z
z, E
o-
s41 0 ❑
N
a
° m
°o
s �
u _j
o
a Q
�J