Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - 05/19/2000 - 00-8/581 OXFORD CIR Y ELK GROVE VILLAGE Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes May 19, 2000 Present: R. Phillips R. Penley T. Rodgers J. Oliveto E. Hauser P . Kaplan J. Franke J. Walz G. Schumm Staff: J. Zaucha, Plan Reviewer Zoning Variation: Docket #00-8 - 581 OXFORD CIRCLE Chairman Phillips called the meeting to order at 7: 00 P.M. and summarized the legal notice for the hearing. Petitioner, Mr. David Prill was sworn in and asked to state his case. Mr. Prill stated that due to the odd shape of his front lot line, the required side yard setback is 9. 5 feet. Mr. Prill explained that this is established by measuring along the curvature of the front lot line. Mr. Prill requested that instead of measuring the lineal footage of the front lot line, the Zoning Board consider establishing the side yard setback by measuring the actual lot width. Mr. Prill indicated that since the lot width is 79 feet at the front lot line, the side yard setback would be 8 feet. Mr. Penley asked if the variance request included the roof overhang. Mr. Prill indicated that he believed so, but was not certain. Mr. Walz asked if the driveway would be widened. Mr. Prill indicated the driveway would be widened, but not the drive apron. Mr. Oliveto asked how the garage would be used. Mr. Frill indicated the garage would be used for a car and additional storage space. Mr. Hauser asked if the garage would cause drainage problems. Mr. Zaucha stated that roof gutters will collect and direct water to the driveway, which will be sloped in a manner not to cause drainage problems. Page 2 Mr. Robert DiDomenico of 578 Jersey Lane asked if a variance approval would set a precedence for future garage encroachments being approved. Mr. DiDomenico was assured by Board members that each variance request is individually reviewed upon it's own merit. Mr. Zaucha was asked if there were any comments from the Engineering Department. Mr. Zaucha suggested that architectural plans be double checked to confirm the variance being requested includes the roof overhang. A review of plans revealed the approximate 12 inch roof overhang was not included in the variance request. After a brief discussion, the Zoning Board decided to amend the variance request to allow for the roof overhang. The amended side yard encroachment was set at two feet and 10 inches (21 -10" ) . At 7:27, Mr. Kaplan motioned to grant the amended variance request to allow the construction of a garage addition which will encroach approximately two feet and ten inches (2' -10" ) into the requried side yard. The motion was seconded by Mr. Penley. A vote was taken which was unanimously in favor of approving the amended variance request. The petitioner was informed by Mr. Phillips that the variance request would not be on the agenda for the May 23rd Village Board meeting. The petitioner was advised to contact the Village Clerk's office to confirm when the docket would be on placed on the Board's agenda. The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, James S. Zauc a Plan Reviewer C: Chairman and Members Zoning Board of Appeals, President and Board of Trustees, Village Clerk, Village Manager, Assistant Village Manager, Assistant to the Village Manager, Administrative Intern, Director of Engineering and Community Development, Director of Public Works, Fire Chief, Deputy Fire Chief (2) , Assistant Fire Chief, Chairman and Members of Plan Commission