The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPLAN COMMISSION - 08/21/1979 - PLAT OF DEDICATIOIN SECTION 24 MINUTES Elk Grove Village Plan Commission Special Meeting August 21, 1979 A special meeting of the Plan Commission was called to order by Acting Chairman Glass at -7:45 p:m. on Monday, August 21, 1979, in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Building, 901 Wellington Avenue. MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: John Glass, Acting Chairman None Leah Cummins, Secretary STAFF PRESENT: Fred Geinosky Stephen M. Feller, George Mullen Administrative Assistant Orrin Stangeland Plat of Dedication for Streets in Section 24 Cummins moved to recommend approval of the plat subject to the following requirements: 1. That an "awareness letter" be sent to all potential property owners of those structures abutting Meacham Road. This letter shall explain that the setback from the Meacham Road right-of-way to the building line is 15 feet. 2. That prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the structures abutting Meacham Road, the developer shall have submitted to the Plan Commission an acceptable landscaping plan and completed the necessary landscaping work in accordance with the plan. The landscaping plan shall provide for the buffering of the townhouse structures from the Meacham Road right-of-way. 3. That prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the structures abutting Meacham Road, the developer shall have submitted to the Plan Commission an acceptable plan for the location of the sidewalk along Meacham Road. This plan shall have been approved by the Cook County Highway Department. Geinosky seconded the motion. All present voted 'AYE' . Docket 79-4: Elk Grove Presbyterian Church - Special Use Permit Mullen moved to recommend that the special use permit to conduct a not-for-profit day care center and pre-school be granted to the Elk Grove Presbyterian Church. Geinosky seconded the motion. All present voted 'AYE' . The meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Submitted by: l ,V�� Stephen M. Feller SMF:ms Administrative Assistant Notes from August 21, 1979 Judiciary, Planning and Zoning Committee/Plan Commission Meeting (8:00 p.m.) JPZ COMMITTEE: PLAN COMMISSION: Nanci L. Vanderweel, Chairman John R. Glass, Acting Chairman James P. Petri Leah Cummins, Secretary Theodore J. Staddler Frederick C. Geinosky STAFF: George E. Mullen Stephen M. Feller, Orrin J. Stangeland Administrative Assistant (Trustee Edward R. Hauser was also in attendance:) Vanderweel began the discussion by asking for comments on the draft, "Request for Proposals to Update the Comprehensive Plan" (attached) .- After attached) .After much discussion, Vanderweel noted that it was the consensus of the group that items 6, 10, and 11 in the draft R.F.P. should be con- solidated into one item. Geinosky inquired as to whether each of the potential consultants should be required to submit a three year financial statement. Vanderweel responded that the answers to the thirteen questions included in the draft R.F.P. should provide a sense of the financial stability of the potential consultants. However, she added that if additional financial information is needed, then it can be asked for during the interview of potential consultants. Geinosky questioned whether the Zoning Ordinance would be updated along with the Comprehensive Master Plan. He added that the Ordinance was poorly organized and needed to be presented more clearly. Vanderweel suggested that it would be appropriate to wait and see what changes take place in the new Comprehensive Plan before updating the Zoning Ordinance. She added that this issue would be discussed during the interview of potential consultants. Glass asked if a requirement of the R.F.P. should be for the potential consultants to include a proposed contract for the completion of the Comprehensive Plan. Vanderweel noted that it was the consensus of the group to require the submission of a proposed contract. Cummins remarked that the planning consultants selected in the past had not been adequate and that there is a need to guard against making the same mistakes. Geinosky suggested that a more structured interview process might be necessary. The group agreed that R.F.P. 's should be sent to the following six firms: Metcalf and Eddy, Inc.; PRC - Toups Corporation; Associated Planners; Planning Horizons, Inc.; Rolf C. Campbell and Associates; and.. Allen L. Kracower & Associates, Inc. The meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m. SMF:ms c: Village Manager Assistant Village Manager Village Clerk Village Board