HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLAN COMMISSION - 04/04/1990 - PARK CHARDONNAY i
PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES
April 04, 1990
Present: John R. Glass, Chairman ( 8: 18 p.m)
Fred Geinosky, Secretary
George Mullen
Dave Paliganoff
Patton Feichter
Paul Ayers
John Meyers
Thomas Parker
Charles Henrici
The meeting was called to order at 8: 17 p.m.
NEW BUSINESS
Item A. - Park Chardonnay proposal to amend the PUD
Agreement. Preliminary Discussion.
Stephen T. Powers, an architect representing the
Diversified Capital Group, presented the requested
amendment to the Plan Commission. The requested amendment
will impact the construction of buildings 2B, 3 and 4.
The petitioner would like to begin construction in
mid-June.
Powers noted that the PUD Plans are 10 years old and
new market research suggests that fewer one bedroom and
more 2 and 3 bedroom units are needed. The present PUD
allows for a total of 174 units. The proposed amendment
would have only 150 units. Because of the reduction in
the number of units, 23 parking spaces are to be
eliminated and replaced with landscaping. By code, 48
spaces could be eliminated; the proposed amendment will
meet parking requirements. Finally, modifications to the
exterior of the buildings includes having rear driveway
entrances into the garage and a masonry wall buffer of the
parking lot along the Biesterfield entrance.
I
I
Under the proposal, there would be fewer units, but
those units would be larger. The petitioner has met with
the homeowner' s group and received a favorable response to
the changes.
Chairman Glass noted that a public hearing is
necessary and that this proposal is for preliminary
discussion.
Commissioner Mullen inquired into why there have been
so many owners of Park Chardonnay. Powers replied that he
could not answer that question; however, Diviserfied's
market research indicates that the units will sell well..
PLAN COMMISSIO&INUTES
APRIL 4, 1990
Page 2
The owners intend on starting the project in June and
finishing within 2 years. The units will sell from
$79 ,000 to $139,000.
Commissioner Paliganoff asked if the representatives
of the homeowners association plan on offering testimony
stating that they are in favor of the project. Power
replied yes.
Commissioner Meyers asked for answers at the public
hearing to the following questions: A), Will the
development meet code; B) What impact will the development
have on the Lake; and C) What impact will there be with
respect to Leicester Road ingress and. egress..
Commissioner Geinosky asked how the Talbot' s Mill
development will impact Park Chardonnay. The Plan
Commission was told that Talbot' s Mill is nearly sold out
of units similiar to those proposed by Park Chardonnay,
thus demonstrating that there is a solid market for such
units.
Chairman , Glass stated that the public hearing will be
scheduled for May 2, 1990.
OLD BUSINESS
Item A Coin-operated Amusement Devices
(Docket 90-5)
i
Chairman Glass asked that the Plan Commission try to
reach a decision on the proposed Text Amendment in a
step-by-step approach. First, should the number of
coin-operated amusement devices allowed be increased from
five to ten.
The Plan Commission discussed the fact that many
I
communities have ten devices as a limit.. In addition, the
Village has received two requests for more machines, and
several places in town have more than five machines
already. Presently, if a business has more than five
machines, it is a coin-operated amusement center. With
the proposal, a business would have to possess 11 or more
machines to be classified as a center.
It was the consensus of the Plan Commission to
increase the number of coin-operated amusement devices
from the present five allowed. Commissioner Meyers was
the lone objector to increasing that number.
Chairman Glass then asked how many machines should be
allowed. Glass stated that the petitioner' s request for
up to ten is reasonable since Midway Motor Lodge already
has ten machines and, except for the coin-operated
amusement device center, no other business has that many I
devices. II
I
i
I
PLAN COMMISSIO&INUTES .
APRIL 4 , 1990
Page 3
Consensus of the Plan Commission was to increase the
number of devices to ten.
Chairman Glass then asked if recreational uses should
be separated from liquor licensed establishments.
Consensus of the Plan Commission was to separate
recreational uses from liquor licenses establishments.
The Plan Commission then examined the recreational
uses to be included in the amendment. The consensus of the
Plan Commission was to incorporate the recreational uses
allowed as conditional uses in the B-1 zoning district
into the Text Amendment. Those recreational uses are
swimming pools, ice skating and roller skating rinks,
billiard parlors, bowling alleys, and indoor theaters.
Furthermore, it was the consensus of the Plan Commission
to strike the word recreational from paragraph 2, section
E( 1) (B) of the proposed Text Amendment.
Chairman Glass then asked if the Plan Commission
wanted coin-operated amusement devices to be permitted
accessory uses in zoning districts other than B-1.
Presently, these devices are located in residentially
zoned and industrially zoned districts, as well as in B-1,
B-2 and B-3 districts.
Consensus of the Plan Commission was for
Coin-Operated Amusement Devices to be permitted in all
zoning districts. The proposal would be similarly stated
as the section on Special Uses which are allowed in all
zoning districts. It appeared that this accessory use
section would be numbered 3 . 3A; however, an opinion from
the Village Attorney is desired on that. matter. j
Commissioner Henrici moved and Mullen seconded a
motion to make paragraph 2 of the proposed Text Amendment
an accessory use for all zoning districts; to separate the
list of recreational uses from licensed liquor
establishments and include the following recreational
uses: bowling alley, billiard hall, ice and roller skating
rinks, swimming pools, and indoor movie theatres; and to
strike the word recreational from paragraph 2, section
E( 1) (B) .
An attorney representing Joseph Serfecz , the owner of
the Grove Mall, addressed the Plan Commission. The
attorney presented a petition with approximately 250
signatures asking that, among other things, the Village
not allow additional coin-operated amusement devices. The
attorney argued that changing the ordinance would allow
video games within 300 feet of licensed liquor
establishments and would have an impact on existing
properties.
r
i
Commissioner Henrici noted that those recreational
uses would be allowed to have five games under the
i
PLAN COMMISSIOWINUTES
APRIL 4, 1990
Page 4
existing regulations. If more than five games were
desired, the business would have to petition the Village
Board. The Village Board would examine each request and
would determine by resolution whether any additional games
would be allowed.
Chairman Glass stated that a number of businesses are
in violation of the existing regulations by virtue of
either the zoning district the business is located in or
the number of machines possessed by the businesses. The
Plan Commission is acting to grant relief to those
businesses.
Upon voting, Chairman Glass, Commissioners Geinosky,
Mullen, Feichter, Henrici, Ayers and Parker voted AYE:
Meyers, NAY. Motion carried.
The Plan Commission then examined the proposed
definition.
Commissioner Parker moved and Mullen seconded a
motion to recommend that the Village Board adopt a Text
Amendment to section 9. 12, Definitions of the Zoning
Ordinance as submitted by the petitioner.
Upon voting, Chairman Glass, Commissioners Geinosky,
Mullen, Feichter, Paliganoff , Ayers, Henrici, and Parker
voted AYE; none NAY; Meyers abstained. Motion carried.
Commissioner Ayers moved and Mullen seconded a motion
to adjourn. Upon voting, all AYES.
The meeting adjourned at 10 : 30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Raymond R. Rummel
Administrative Assistant
rh41090
C: Chairman& Members Plan Commission, Village
President, Board of Trustees, Village Clerk, Village
Manager, Assistant Village Manager, Administrative
Assistant, Administrative Intern, Director of
Engineering and Community Development, Director of
Public Works, Fire Chief, Deputy Fire Chief, Village
Attorney, Park District
i
i
I