HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLAN COMMISSION - 04/01/1981 - CENTEX Minutes
Elk Grove Village Plan Commission
Wednesday, April 1, 1981
The regular meeting of the Plan Commission was called to order at
8 p.m. on Wednesday, April 1, 1981 in the Council Chamber of the
Municipal Building, 901 Wellington Avenue.
MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT:
Kenna, Edward W. , Chairman Stephen M. Feller,
Cummins, Leah, Secretary Administrative Assistant
Geinosky, Frederick C. Thomas Rettenbacher,
Glass, John R. Building Commissioner
Paliganoff, David J.
Stangeland, Orrin J.
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Mullen, George E.
Docket 81-3: Centex Homes' Petition to Amend the
Special Use Permit for the Hampton
Farms Development
The Plan Commission, acting as a Zoning Commission, conducted a
Public Hearing on the petition of Centex Homes Midwest, Inc. for an
amendment to Ordinance No. 1292, which grants a Special Use Permit for
development of property as a Planned Unit Development in Winston Grove
Section 24. The petitioners were requesting the amendment to make
certain changes to the building design and number of bedrooms in the
remaining units that have not been constructed under the approved plan.
The remaining units would be constructed as follows:
(1) Fifty-two (52) townhouse modules, each consisting of a one story,
two bedroom condominium unit over a one story, one bedroom con-
dominium unit. Each condominium unit would have an attached
one car garage and a private entry.
(2) Ninety (90) two story, two or three bedroom units. Each unit
would have an attached one car garage.
The property is located west of Meacham Road and north of the Chicago
District Pipeline right-of-way.
William Gilli1an, President of Centex Homes; Fred Feinstein,
Attorney; Russel Taylor, Land Planner; Paul Ulatowski, Engineer;
Gerald Harker, Vice President of Centex Homes; and Joe Luciani, Vice
President of Centex Homes, were present to represent the petitioner.
Feinstein began by explaining that this petition is a separate
issue from the Elk Grove Park District's desire to work with Centex
Homes to acquire land for a golf course in Section 24. Centex has
not yet submitted a petition for the zoning changes that might be
needed to accommodate the golf course.
Plan Commission Minutes - 2 - April 1, 1981
Docket 81-3 (continued)
Gillilan noted that the current Hampton Farms townhouse project
has been financially unsuccessful. He related that discussions with
potential purchasers of townhouse units indicated that the development
would have broader market appeal if a few changes were made to the
building design. The potential purchasers suggested attaching the
garages to the units, reducing the percentage of three bedroom units,
providing a three bedroom unit with 2�- bathrooms, and revising the
exterior design to a more traditional architectural style.
Gillilan pointed out that Centex is not seeking any variations
to the Village's Zoning Ordinance and that the utility and street
locations would not change under the new proposal. Gillilan added
that the number of buildings would remain the same as approved and
that the new plan would have more open space than was previously
approved.
Gillilan reported that the number of units and bedrooms would
change under the proposed plan as follows:
Approved by Proposed
Ordinance 1292 Amendment
Units 206 258
Bedrooms 553 504 - 594*
*Centex would retain the flexibility of choosing between
having 2 or 3 bedrooms in ninety of the units.
Gillilan added that the increase in dwelling units would most likely
reduce the monthly assessment and maintenance burden of future
homeowners.
Paliganoff asked if the proposed structures will have fire walls.
Gillilan indicated that the Building Code requires a two hour fire
separation between units.
Stangeland questioned whether or not Centex had conducted marketing
research when developing the new product. Gillilan replied that he
had spent many hours talking with potential purchasers about the types
of changes that should be made to the units.
Stangeland asked if there were adequate provisions for parking
in the proposed plan. Gillilan replied that adequate parking will be
available and that this project has more parking than most competing
developments. He added that the previously approved plan provided
for 3.6 parking spaces per unit and the new plan has 2.5 parking
spaces per unit.
Cummins inquired whether or not Centex had considered including
basements in the units. Gillilan replied that there is not a sufficient
demand for basements because of the additional costs that are involved.
Glass questioned if the architectural style of the proposed
buildings will blend in with the units that have already been constructed.
Gillilan replied that in his opinion the two styles are compatible.
Plan Commission Minutes - 3 - April 1, 1981
Docket 81-3 (continued)
Following is a synopsis of comments presented to the Plan Commission
from the audience:
- The types of people purchasing one bedroom units is different
than those who purchase two and three bedroom units.
- The two buildings along Meacham Road should have the same
architectural style as the existing buildings.
- Centex has not responded to a homeowner's letter which raised
legal questions on the language of a purchase contract for a
townhouse unit.
- The proposed plan may not provide adequate parking because many
homeowners use their garage for storage.
Kenna advised the petitioner that the testimony will be discussed
by the Plan Commission at a meeting on April 15, 1981. A full account
of the proceedings is available in the Official Transcript.
The meeting adjourned at 10:40 p.m.
Submitted by:
Stephen M. Feller
Administrative Assistant
ms
c: Chairman & Members of Plan Commission, Village President & Board
of Trustees, Village Clerk, Village Manager, Assistant Village
Manager, Administrative Assistant, Administrative Intern, Building
Commissioner, Village Engineer, Director of Public Works, Director
of Parks and Recreation, Centex, NWMC, McGraw-Hill, Fire Chief.