Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLAN COMMISSION - 02/19/1986 - SIXPENCE INN/STRAWBERRY HILL/DES. CONTROL Minutes ELK GROVE VILLAGE PLAN COMMISSION Date: Wednesday, February 19, 1986 Location: Council Chamber Municipal Building 901 Wellington Avenue The meeting was called to order at 8:12 p.m. by Chairman Glass. Members Present: Members Absent: John Glass, Chairman None Leah Cummins, Secretary Fred Geinosky Clark Fulton David Paliganoff Orrin Stangeland George Mullen Others: Peter Trapalino, Vice President of Sixpence Inn Bill Ruff, Director of Development, Sixpence Inn Stuart Handler, Developer of Strawberry Hill Alan Rosenzweig, Architech, Rosenzweig and Associates Sixpence Inn (SW corner of Busse Road and Oakton Street) Peter Trapalino explained the need for a one year extension to the existing Special Use Permit for a restaurant in I-1 zoning. He said that no restaurant had yet signed a contract to build on the lot as Sixpence has been expending their energies with the 100 room building addition. George Mullen asked if the lack of a restaurant hurt the motel 's business. Mr. Trapolino responded that a restaurant would be an asset but the lack of one has not hurt business. He also stated that once the new addition opens, the motel would be big enough to support a restaurant. Leah Cummins suggested that the Village's economic development consultants might be able to assist Sixpence to find a restaurant. George Mullen asked why the requested extension was only for one year. Peter Trapalino stated that he would prefer having two years. John Glass stated that the reason the Special Use Permit was limited to one year after the motel was built, in the first place, was to ensure the maintenance of the lot. Bill Ruff stated that the approval of a two year extension would assist Sixpence in finding a restaurant. Following further discussion, George Mullen made a motion to recommend a two year extension of the Special Use Permit and Leah Cummins seconded it. Fred Geinosky stated that Sixpence would still be responsible for maintaining the lot. The vote for approval passed unanimously. o- PC Minutes - 2 - February 19, 1986 Strawberry Hill Plaza (NE corner of Meacham & Biesterfield Roads) Alan Rosenzweig, the architect for the Strawberry Hill Plaza informed the Plan Commission members that on February 18, 1986 the Zoning Board of Appeals had voted to recommend that the Village Board approve all three variances requested by Strawberry Hill. They are: 1) sideyard setback variation of 19'; 2) rearyard setback variation of 5'; and 3) 2V overhang of parking space to be sidewalk. Robin Weaver substantiated those remarks and added that the President of the Roundtree Association, Mark Weiler, was present at the ZBA meeting to convey Roundtree's agreement on the screening plan and preference for the developer's setback variance requests. Tom Rettenbacher explained the need for a special location plan since ten parking spaces would be across lot lines. John Glass inquired about the 2' ' overhang on the perimeter stalls. He stated that he would prefer that they were not gravel. Alan Rosenzweig responded that it would probably be grass. Discussion followed regarding snowplowing and the appearance of the parking lot. George Mullen made a motion to approve the parking stall variance to permit any perimeter parking space to overhang 2;f' over a landscaped, green area which is specifically not gravel or stone and Leah Cummins seconded it. Leah Cummins made a motion to recommend approval of the special location plan and the extension of parking stalls across lot lines as shown on the special location plan. George Mullen seconded the motion. The vote for approval for both motions was unanimous. (9:34 p.m. , 5 minute recess. ) Architectural Design Control Orrin Stangeland discussed ideas brought up at the July 23 subcommittee meeting. He mentioned the idea of having a resolution and including a checklist of items to be given to developers to encourage the prevention of monotonous design. David Paliganoff suggested the burden be placed upon the developer. A developer would have to demonstrate that his designs were not monotonous at the public hearing. Orrin Stangeland stated that while he agreed with the idea of voluntary compliance, the JPZ Committee had asked them to draft a resolution. The resolution would encourage compliance and a check- list could be given to developers as a guideline. The Plan Commission made a direction to staff to draft a resolution with attached guidelines for their review. The meeting was adjourned at 10:20 p.m. Respectfully su�bmittted, a5- J) M. Coakley ms Administrative Intern I